It is WaSP’s hope that, once informed of the benefits standards provide, site owners will stop viewing their sites as a species of print advertising that must look exactly the same in all environments. And that they will focus instead on delivering appropriate content and functionality within the context of presentations that may vary slightly according to the needs and capabilities of differing browsers and devicesI would add "differing people" to this list, too.
Highly paid professionals* continue to churn out invalid, inaccessible sites filled with structurally meaningless markup, huge image maps, excessively nested tables, and outdated detection scripts that cause the very usability problems they were originally intended to prevent.*I wouldn't call them "professionals" as a mark of a professional is that they follow the standards of their profession.
Many books on web development still teach outdated methods, and many practitioners take pride in delivering sites that look and work exactly the same in compliant and non–compliant desktop browsers alike, at the cost of accessibility, long–term viability, forward compatibility, and lack of alternative device support.I think I can face the day now. Thank you, drive through.
[Sports]


Permalink